The implication of Thorium fraction on neutronic parameters of pebble bed reactor
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.48129/kjs.v48i3.9984Keywords:
thorium, neutronic parameters, pebble bed reactor, MCNP6, ENDF/B-VIIAbstract
Thorium abundance in the Earth's crust is estimated to be three to four times higher than uranium. This is one potential advantages of thorium as a provider of attractive fuel to produce nuclear energy. Less transuranics produced by thorium during the fuel burnup in the reactor may also be an another advantage for reducing the long term burden of high level long-lived waste. The scope of this paper is to study the implication of thorium fraction on neutronic parameters of pebble bed reactor. Chinese HTR-10 was chosen as the reactor model and the (Th, 235U)O2 fuel was used in this study. A series of calculations with various thorium fraction in (Th,235U)O2 fuel were performed using MCNP6 code and ENDF/B-VII library. The calculation results show that the total temperature coefficient of reactivity of thorium-added pebble bed reactors are generally more negative than those of LEU-fuelled one, except for 10% thorium fraction. The kinetic parameters, especially prompt neutron lifetime and neutron generation time of pebble bed reactors are higher which means the addition of thorium in the fuel makes the reactor more easily controlled. However, the burnup calculations show that the introduction of thorium in the same fuel kernel as LEU within pebble bed reactor is unable to lengthen the fuel residence time. Instead, in all considered thorium fraction, fuel residence time is shorter. The reason is simply because fissile load is decreasing as thorium fraction increases, whilst 233U conversion is far from being sufficient to maintain reactor criticality. It can be concluded that in order to ensure thorium has meaningful share in fission event, its fraction must be kept at least 40%. If the initial fissile load can be kept the same as LEU-fuelled pebble bed reactor, a minimum of 40% thorium fraction can potentially lengthen fuel residence time.
References
Alzamly, M.A., Aziz, M, Badawi, A.A., et al. (2020) Burnup analysis for HTR-10 reactor core loaded with uranium and thorium oxide. Nuclear Engineering and Technology, 52:674-680
Bjӧrk, K.I. (2015) Thorium fuels for light water reactors. Ph. D. thesis, Chalmers University of Technology, Göteborg, Sweden.
Chadwick, M.B. Obložinský, P., Herman, M., et al. (2006) ENDF/B-VII: next generation evaluated nuclear data library for nuclear science and technology. Nuclear Data Sheets, 107:2931-3060.
GIF (2010) Use of thorium as the nuclear fuel cycle. Generation IV International Forum, 1-13.
Gintner, S.K. (2010) Thorium-based fuel cycle: saving uranium in a 200 MWth pebble bed high temperature reactor. Master thesis, North-West University, Potchefstroom, South Africa.
Goorley, J.T., James, M.R. & Booth, T.E., et al. (2013) Initial MCNP6 Release Overview - MCNP6 version 1.0. LA-UR-13-22934, Los Alamos National Laboratory.
Hosseini, S.A. & Athari-Allaf, M. (2012) Implementation and benchmarking of ENDF/B-VII based library for PBM reactor analysis with MCNP4c. Progress in Nuclear Energy, 60:27-30.
Hosseini, S.A. & Athari-Allaf, M. (2016) Effects of the wallpaper fuel design on the neutronic behavior of the HTR-10. Kerntechnik, 81(6):627-633.
IAEA-TECDOC-1450 (2005) Thorium fuel cycle – Potential benefits and challanges. International Atomic Energy Agency.
Jing, X. & Sun, Y. (1998) Benchmark Problem of the HTR-10 Initial Core - Draft Version. Institute of Nuclear Energy Technology (INET), Beijing, China.
Lebenhaft, J.L. (2001) MCNP4B modeling of pebble-bed reactors. MSNE Thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Massachusetts, USA.
Setiadipura, T., Irwanto, D. & Zuhair (2015) Preliminary neutronic design of high burnup OTTO cycle pebble bed reactor. Atom Indonesia, 41(1):7-15.
Wilson, W.B., Dyadechko, V., England, T.R., et al. (2006) A Manual for CINDER90 Version 06.1 Codes and Data. Los Alamos National Laboratory, Draft Report, Los Alamos, NM.
Wu, Z., Lin, D. & Zhong, D. (2002) The design features of the HTR-10. Nuclear Engineering and Design, 218:25-32.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0029-5493(02)00182-6
Zuhair, Suwoto, Adrial, H. & Setiadipura, T. (2019a) Study on MOX core characteristics of Experimental Power Reactor using MCNP6 code. Journal of Physics: Conference Series 1198 022031.
doi:10.1088/1742-6596/1198/2/022031
Zuhair, Suwoto, Setiadipura, T., Bakhri, S. & Sunaryo, G.R. (2018) Study on characteristic of temperature coefficient of reactivity for plutonium core of pebbled bed reactor. Journal of Physics: Conference Series 962 012058.
doi:10.1088/1742-6596/962/1/012058
Zuhair, Suwoto, Setiadipura, T. & Kuijper, J.C. (2019b) Study on the characteristics of effective delayed neutron fraction (βeff) for pebble-bed reactor with plutonium fuel. Iranian Journal of Science and Technology Transactions A: Science, 1-9.
http://doi.org/10.1007/s40995-019-00772-8
Zuhair, Suwoto, Setiadipura, T. & Kuijper, J.C. (2019c) The effects of fuel type on control rod reactivity of pebble-bed reactor. Nukleonika, 64(4):131-138.
doi: https://doi.org/10.2478/nuka-2019-0017
Zuhair, Suwoto, Setiadipura, T. & Su’ud, Z. (2017) The effects of applying silicon carbide coating on core reactivity of pebble-bed HTR in water ingress accident. Kerntechnik, 82(1):92-97.
doi: https://doi.org/10.3139/124.110628
Zuhair, Suwoto, Setiadipura, T. & Su’ud, Z. (2020) Study on MCNP6 model in the calculation of kinetic parameters for pebble bed reactor. Acta Polytechnica, 60(2):175-184. https://doi.org/10.14311/AP.2020.60.0175