Fine-tuning of season definition for genetic analysis of fertility, productivity, and longevity traits in Iranian Holstein dairy cows

Authors

  • Shahin Eghbalsaied Department of Animal Science, Isfahan (Khorasgan) branch, Islamic Azad University, Isfahan, Iran. P. O. Box: 8166117677
  • Laleh Akasheh
  • Mahmood Honarvar
  • Amir Davar Forouzandeh
  • Ali Ghazikhani-Shad
  • Fatemeh Bankizadeh
  • Rohullah Abdullahpour

Keywords:

Fertility, genetic parameters, Holstein, model, reliability.

Abstract

Fixed environmental effects have shown to affect random genetic and residual effects.In this study, we evaluated various month merge classes as fixed environmental effecton estimation of genetic parameters for production, reproduction and longevity traitsof Iranian Holstein dairy cows. Data were collected from Holstein cows, in Isfahanprovince of Iran from 1993 to 2009. First, the edited data (53,908 records) were analyzedusing general linear model (GLM) in SAS package. Single-month classes yielded theleast mean square error (MSE) and the highest R-square. Then, the restricted maximumlikelihood (REML) and the best linear unbiased prediction (BLUP) procedures wereused to estimate genetic parameters and breeding values (EBVs) from the best models,which included single-month effect compared to triple-month (standard astronomicalseason in northern hemisphere) effect as a traditional model. Agreeing with the analysisof variance (ANOVA) results, standard season effect also led to higher MSE, Akaikeinformation criterion (AIC), Bayesian information criterion (BIC), and likelihood ratiotest (LRT). However, estimated heritabilities and subsequently mean accuracies forEBVs were considerably higher, when alternative definitions of season were explored.In conclusion, results of this study showed a considerable tradeoff between “best”(MSE, AIC, BIC, and LRT) and “unbiased” model indicators (estimated heritability andmean accuracy of EBVs). Importantly, this confounding effect was more evident forreproduction traits, age at first service (AFS) in particular. However, further worldwideevaluations of Holstein dairy cows are needed to determine the importance of modeloptimization on random effect predictions.

Author Biography

Shahin Eghbalsaied, Department of Animal Science, Isfahan (Khorasgan) branch, Islamic Azad University, Isfahan, Iran. P. O. Box: 8166117677

Department of Animal Science

References

Ansari-Lari, M., Rezagholi, M. & Reiszadeh, M. (2009) Trends in calving ages and calving intervals for

Iranian Holsteins in Fars province, southern Iran. Tropical animal health and production, 41:1283-

Eghbalsaied, S. (2011) Estimation of genetic parameters for 13 female fertility indices in Holstein dairy

cows. Tropical animal health and production, 43:811-816.

Jamrozik, J., Fatehi, J., Kistemaker, G. & Schaeffer, L. (2005) Estimates of genetic parameters for

Canadian Holstein female reproduction traits. Journal of dairy science, 88:2199-2208.

Mulder, H., Hill, W., Vereijken, A. & Veerkamp, R. (2009) Estimation of genetic variation in residual

variance in female and male broiler chickens. Animal, 3:1673-1680.

Neves, H.H., Carvalheiro, R. & Queiroz, S.A. (2012) Genetic and environmental heterogeneity of

residual variance of weight traits in Nellore beef cattle. Genetic Selection Evolution, 44:44-19.

Nilforooshan, M.A. & Edriss, M.A. (2007) Comparison of Holstein bull semen sources on milk traits in

Isfahan province in Iran. Archives animal Breeding, 50:71-83

Norberg, E., Rogers, G., Goodling, R., Cooper, J. & Madsen, P. (2004) Genetic parameters for test-day

electrical conductivity of milk for first-lactation cows from random regression models. Journal of

dairy science, 87:1917-1924.

Peel, M.C., Finlayson, B.L. & McMahon, T.A. (2007) Updated world map of the Köppen-Geiger climate

classification. Hydrology and earth system sciences discussions, 4:439-473.

Posada, D. & Buckley, T.R. (2004) Model selection and model averaging in phylogenetics: advantages

of Akaike information criterion and Bayesian approaches over likelihood ratio tests. Systematic

biology, 53:793-808.

Pritchard, T., Coffey, M., Mrode, R. & Wall, E. (2012) Genetic parameters for production, health, fertility and longevity traits in dairy cows. Animal, 7:34-46.

Saberi, Z. & Ganjali, M. (2013). A conditional Bayesian approach for testing independence in two-way

contingency tables. Kuwait Journal of Science, 40:103-113.

Sadeghi-Sefidmazgi, A., Moradi-Shahrbabak, M., Nejati-Javaremi, A., Miraei-Ashtiani, S. & Amer,

P. (2012) Breeding objectives for Holstein dairy cattle in Iran. Journal of dairy science, 95:3406-

Toghiani, S. (2013) Genetic parameters and correlations among linear type traits in the first lactation of

Holstein Dairy cows. African Journal of Biotechnology, 10:1507-1510.

Ward, E.J. (2008) A review and comparison of four commonly used Bayesian and maximum likelihood

model selection tools. Ecological Modelling, 211:1-10.

Downloads

Published

08-02-2016