Sustainability assessment of modern urban transport and its role in the reduction of greenhouse gas emissions: A case study of Metro Bus System (MBS), Lahore

Authors

  • Syed Imran Hussain Shah Department of Environmental Management, National College of Business Administration and Economics (NCBA&E), Lahore, Pakistan
  • Rab Nawaz Department of Environmental Sciences, The University of Lahore, Lahore, Pakistan
  • Sajjad Ahmad Department of Environmental Sciences, COMSATS Institute of Information Technology, Vehari Campus, Pakistan
  • Muhammad Arshad Department of Agriculture and Food Technology, Faculty of Life Sciences, Karakoram International University (KIU), Gilgit,

Keywords:

Sustainable Development, Sustainable Mobility, GHGs Reduction, Climate Change Mitigation

Abstract

Climate change is resulting in the gradual rise of the temperature of our planet, and greenhouse gasses (GHGs) are believed to be primarily responsible for the phenomenon. The first part of the paper quantifies emission reduction of greenhouse gases by shifting mode of transport to metro bus Lahore from other vehicles including vans, buses, 3-wheelers and motorcycles. Furthermore, this paper assesses the sustainability of Metro Bus Lahore through a set of specific indicators. A survey was conducted to categorize the passengers according to their modes of travelling before metro bus and travelling distance. Information including fuel type, mileage and average passenger capacity of vehicles were collected for estimation of emission of greenhouse gases. The net amounts of carbon dioxide, methane and nitrous oxide avoided were 14242.66, 159.68 and 632.03 tonnes CO2-e, respectively. Total annual amount of GHGs avoided was 15034.38 tonnes CO2-e (59.25%) by metro bus project. It was found that annual emission of GHGs per passenger kilometer reduced to 1.06 kg CO2-e by metro bus from 4.41 kg CO2-e by different vehicles. Amount of total annual fuel avoided was 6574.52 kL. We can affirm that an average sustainability is associated, in general, to Metro Bus Lahore in terms of social, economic and environmental sustainability. However, there was need to make planning information and documents available to the public before starting project. It was observed that there was problem for disaster management due to lack of emergency exit plan/route and poor conditions of firefighting equipment. There is need to shift energy source of metro bus from fossil fuels to renewable energy for climate change mitigation and sustainable development.

References

Alam, S., Fatima, A., & Butt, M. S. (2007). sustainable develoment in Pakistan in the context of evergy consumption demand and environment degration. Journal of Asian Economics , 825-837.

Bahadure, S. & Kotharkar, R. (2015). Assessing Sustainability of Mixed Use Neighbourhoods through Residents’ Travel Behaviour and Perception: The Case of Nagpur, India. Sustainability, 7,

-12189; DOI: 10.3390/su70912164

Commonwealth of Australia (2014). National Greenhouse Accounts Factors. Canberra: The Department of the Environment.

Haque M.M., Chin, H.C., & Debnath, A.K. (2013). Sustainable, safe, smart—three key elements of Singapore’s evolving transport policies. Transport Policy, Volume 27, May 2013, Pages 20–31

Hayashi, Y., Doi K., Yagishita, M. & Kuwata, M. (2004). Urban Transport Sustainability: Asian Trends, Problems and Policy Practices. International Conference on Environmentally Sustainable Transport in the Asian Region, Nagoya, Japan, 25th March, 2003. pp. 27-45.

Lisbon Metro. (2010). Relatório de Sustentabilidade, 2010. Metropolitano de Lisboa. Available online:http://www.metrolisboa.pt/wp-content/uploads/Relat%C3%B3rio-de-sustentabilidade2010.pdf

OECD. (2010). Reducing Transport Greenhouse Gas Emissions, Trends & Data 2010.www.internationaltransportforum.org/Pub/pdf/10GHGTrends.pdf.

Pojani, D., & Stead, D. (2015). Sustainable Urban Transport in the Developing World: Beyond Megacities. Sustainability 2015, 7, 7784-7805; doi:10.3390/su7067784

PortoMetro. (2013). Relatório de Sustentabilidade, 2013. Metro do Porto. Available online: http://www.metrodoporto.pt/Download.aspx?file=Fe2OxrLMuVX3vbcE3v+exaKvSkeJR/8/gqHmgfuycwiBxjFGjGJzZMbfz8W+g/60J6AOHCVX+1kW94WgRGR8Pg==&name=Relat%C3%B3rio%20de%20Sustentabilidade%202013

Qamar, Z., Arif, M., Rasool, G. & Afzaal, M. (2009). Technical

Report No. PMD-22/2009. Pakistan Meteorological Department.

Redman, L., Friman M, Gärling T. and Hartig T. (2013). Quality attributes of public transport that attract car users: A research review. Transport Policy, Volume 25, January 2013, Pages 119–127.

RENFE. (2008). Environmental Report. Available online: http://www.renfe.com/EN/docs/2008_Enviromental_Report.pdf

Ribeiro, K., Kobayashi, S., Beuthe, M., Gasca, J., Greene, D., Lee, D. S., & Kingdom, U. (2007). Transport and its infrastructure. In B. Metz, O. R. Davidson, P. R. Bosch, R. Dave, & L. A. Meyer (Eds.), Climate Change 2007: Mitigation. Contribution of Working Group III to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Chnge. United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA: Cambridge University Press.

Scheurer, J. & Porta, S., (2006). Centrality and Connectivity in Public Transport Networks and their Significance of Transport Sustainability in Cities. World Planning Schools Congress, Mexico DF, 13-16 July, 2006.

Shapiro, R. J., Hassett, K. A., & Arnold, F. S. (2002). Conserving Energy and Preserving the Environment: The Role of Public Transportation. Retrieved 23 January 2014 from http://sonecon.com/docs/studies/enenv_0702.pdf.

Sheikh, M. (2014). Metrobus: Mobllity and sensibility. Lahore: Dawn News.

Sims R., R., Schaeffer, F., Creutzig, X., Cruz-Núñez, D’Agosto, M., Dimitriu, D. Tiwari, G. (2014). Chapter 8 Transport. In O. Edenhofer, R. Pichs-Madruga, Y. Sokona, E. Farahani, S. Kadner, K. Seyboth, J. C. Minx (Eds.), Climate Change 2014: Mitigation of Climate Change. Contribution of Working Group III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (pp. 1–44). doi: 10.2753/JES1097-203X330403.

Sweeting, W.J. & Winfield, P.H. (2012). Future transportation: Lifetime considerations and framework for sustainability assessment. Energy Policy 2012.

The European Commission. (2011). Roadmap to a Single European Transport Area (No. COM (2011) 144) (Final. pp. 1–31). Brussels: European Commission.

UFL, (2016). College of Design, Construction & Planning (UFL) https://dcp.ufl.edu/sustainability/sustainability-and-the-built-environment/the-significance-of-sustainability-to-the-built-environment/

World Population Review. (2017). [Online] Available at http://worldpopulationreview.com/world-cities/lahore-population/

Yamane, T. (1967). Statistics: An Introductory Analysis, 2nd Edition, New York: Harper and Row.

Zheng, J., Atkinson-Palombo, C., McCahill, C., O’Hara, R. & Garrick, N. (2011). Quantifying the Economic Domain of Transportation Sustainability, Transportation Research Record 2242, TRB (www.trb.org), pp. 19-28; http://amonline.trb.org/12koec/12koec/1

Downloads

Published

06-03-2020

Issue

Section

Earth & Environment