Molecular docking and molecular dynamic study of multiple medicinal plants’ bioactive compounds as human papillomavirus type 16 E5 protein inhibitor

DOI: 10.48129/kjs.16169

Authors

  • Arief Hidayatullah Dept. of Biology, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Universitas Negeri Malang, East Java, Indonesia
  • Wira Eka Putra Department of Biology, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Science, Universitas Negeri Malang
  • Muhaimin Rifa'i Dept. of Biology, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Brawijaya University, East Java, Indonesia
  • Sustiprijatno Indonesian Center for Agricultural Biotechnology and Genetic Resources Research and Development, West Java, Indonesia
  • Muhammad Fikri Heikal Tropical Medicine International Program, Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, Thailand.
  • Diana Widiastuti Dept. of Chemistry, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Science, Universitas Pakuan, West Java, Indonesia
  • Galuh Wening Permatasari Indonesian Research Institute for Biotechnology and Bioindustry, Bogor, West Java, Indonesia
  • Hendra Susanto Dept. of Biology, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Universitas Negeri Malang, East Java, Indonesia
  • Adawiyah Suriza Shuib Institute of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Science, Universiti Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.48129/kjs.16169

Abstract

Cervical cancer is the second most prevalent form of cancer in Indonesia. HPV16 and HPV 18 are the leading causes of cervical cancer, accounting for 70-90% of cases. The E5 protein may play a critical role in the disease’s development. Although the HR version of this protein may have some benefits in terms of evading the immune system through MHC I and influencing the cell cycle via p21/p27, very few research have been performed owing to its tiny size and high hydrophobicity. The purpose of this research is to predict the antiviral activity of asarinin and thiazolo[3,2-a]benzimidazole-3(2H)-one,2-(2-fluorobenzylideno)-7,8-dimethyl using molecular docking and molecular dynamics. The docking results showed that the two candidate drugs had a lower docking affinity than rimantadine but comparable stability. Both potent compounds are predicted to disrupt MHC I localization in the ER, the ability of infected cells to proliferate, and the virion assembly process, whereas rimantadine is predicted to disrupt infected cells’ proliferation ability via EGFR regulation and inhibit the activation process of mitogenic signaling in keratinocytes.

Author Biographies

Arief Hidayatullah, Dept. of Biology, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Universitas Negeri Malang, East Java, Indonesia

 

 

Muhaimin Rifa'i, Dept. of Biology, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Brawijaya University, East Java, Indonesia

 

 

Muhammad Fikri Heikal, Tropical Medicine International Program, Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, Thailand.

 

 

Diana Widiastuti, Dept. of Chemistry, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Science, Universitas Pakuan, West Java, Indonesia

 

 

Galuh Wening Permatasari, Indonesian Research Institute for Biotechnology and Bioindustry, Bogor, West Java, Indonesia

 

 

Hendra Susanto, Dept. of Biology, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Universitas Negeri Malang, East Java, Indonesia

 

 

Adawiyah Suriza Shuib, Institute of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Science, Universiti Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia

 

 

Published

08-05-2022